|
|
Authorized user can see question and answers.
Please log in or sign up. 
|
#32. You want to upgrade a cluster with two members to VPN-1 NGX. The Smart Center Server and both members are version VPN-1/FireWall-1 NG FP3, with the latest Hotfix. What is the correct upgrade procedure?
1. Change the version, in the General Properties of the gateway-cluster object.
2. Upgrade the Smart Center Server, and reboot after upgrade
3. Runt cpstop on one member, while leaving the other member running. Upgrade one member at a time, and reboot after upgrade.
4. Reinstasll the Security Policy
Show comments for this question (0)
Add comments
Link to this question
|
|
#34. You are preparing to deploy a VPN-1 Pro Gateway for VPN-1 NGX. You have five systems to choose from for the new Gateway, and you must conform to the following requirements:
* Operating-System vendor’s license agreements
* Check Point’s license agreement
* Minimum operating-system hardware specification
* Minimum Gateway hardware specification
* Gateway installed on a supported operating system (OS)
Which machine meets ALL of the requirements?
Show comments for this question (0)
Add comments
Link to this question
|
|
#36. Company has configured a Common Internet File System (CIFS) resource to allow access to the public partition of Company.com’s file server, on //Company13/logigame/files/public. Mrs. Sheets receives reports that users are unable to access the shared partition, unless they use the file server’s IP address. Which of the following is a possible cause?
Show comments for this question (0)
Add comments
Link to this question
|
|
#37. Company is creating rules and objects to control VoIP traffic in her organization (Company.com), through a VPN-1 NGX Security Gateway. Mrs. Sheets creates VoIP Domain SIP objects to represent each of Company.com’s three SIP gateways. Exams then creates a simple group to contain the VoIP Domain SIP objects.
When Exams attempts to add the VoIP Domain SIP objects to the group, they are not listed.
What is the problem?
Show comments for this question (0)
Add comments
Link to this question
|
|
#39. Problems sometimes occur when distributing IPSec packets to a few machines in a Load Sharing Multicast mode cluster, even though the machines have the same source and destination IP addresses. What is the best Load Sharing method for preventing this type of problem?
Show comments for this question (1)
Add comments
Link to this question
|
|
#40. Exhibit:
State synchronization is enabled on both members in a cluster, and the Security Policy is successfully installed. No protocols or services have been unselected for “selective sync”. The exhibit is the fw tab – t connections –s output from both members.
Is State synchronization working properly between the two members?
Show comments for this question (1)
Add comments
Link to this question
|
|
|
|
 gen. 0.081
|
Server date 19:22 22-11-2008
|
Developed by Zip © 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Forum
Master braindump